The problem with professional institutes

2 Aug



Prior to NAATI’s restructure into a company
limited by guarantee in 1983, it was expected
that this national association would eventually
take over the functions (accreditation, course
approval, etc.) of NAATI. However, it soon
became apparent that two separate organisations
would be needed in order to manage the various
priorities of the wider industry.


A sad tale but true

24 Apr

IMG_3358 best cropped to 320 x 200 shortIn a recent moment of uncharacteristic whimsy, I responded to a ProZ enquiry by a private client, who needed a certified translation of various documents.
The client’s response to my offer of assistance opened follows:  Thank you for your response!  I am rather dismayed that, of the dozen or so responses that I received via proz, yours was the only one without English spelling, grammar and usage errors.  But I suppose I should look on the bright side: if I want to sign up with proz myself later, as a translator, the competition won’t be as tough as I had thought.  🙂

She is a native English speaker, and her compliment initially lifted my spirits; after all, most people are reluctant to compliment one’s professionalism, lest they be thought of as patronising.  It is a rare treat, therefore, and should be savoured.  On reflection, however, I understood that her words should not be regarded as a compliment about my skills and professionalism, however tempting that may be.

Her words should be understood for what they really are, i.e. a serious indictment of the so-called ‘translation industry’ that has sought to harness and exploit the skills of translation professionals through global sourcing mechanisms like ProZ et al.  This is sometimes erroneously, but more often than not fraudulently, referred to as an innovative expansion of the ‘free market’.  There is nothing new about this sort of opportunistic, exploitative and long-discredited c[r]apitalism, of course, and it is not going to be abandoned in favour of more ethical but less profitable alternatives any time soon.

It would be easy to dismiss it as a minor incident of little consequence, but I have come across disappointed, and sometimes despairing, clients before; so I think it is worthwhile to have a closer look at the details and what they imply:

1) The client clearly indicated that she needed Dutch translated into English and that she preferred a native speaker of the target language.  If we lived in a rational world, having to spell out the latter requirement would be regarded as redundant, but it seems we don’t.
Why then would all responses, bar mine, be from people who are either not fluent in English, or worse, who are not very articulate if they are native speakers of English?

2) She also asked for a certified translation.  Am I to assume that all the responses came from ‘accredited’ professionals?  Or did those who responded believe they would be able to ‘fake’ it; or worse, believed they could get an ‘accredited’ translator to do it for even less than what they quoted?

Are we seeing the beginning of the end of the ‘free market’ global sourcing model for translations?  Are those who are qualified to handle a translation like this no longer responding to the ‘offerings/opportunities’ on ProZ et al?  Did our professional colleagues wake up to the idea that depriving predatory language services brokers/agencies of their expertise, though perhaps counter-intuitive, is the obvious way to improve their own professional status and career?

In view of the warm feelings of appreciation the client engendered in me, I felt I owed her a warning about entering the translation profession on the basis of assumptions derived from the responses she received via a blind auction site like ProZ.  I pointed out to her that linguistics, professional competence, knowledge or expertise, are not necessarily the deciding factors for an ‘industry’ that uses ‘global sourcing’ to hire casual or freelance translators.

What really saddens me about this, is that yet another person will talk about her very ordinary experience, without clearly understanding and differentiating between the translation  ‘industry’ and the translation ‘profession’.

It is mostly our own fault.  Many among our colleagues appear unable or unwilling to decide whether they are free-lancers (casual, contract workers), run a small business (selling services for profit), or whether they are self-employed professionals (in private practice).  Until we decide among ourselves who and/or what we are, we will not convince anyone else.
As a consequence, we will have the devil of a job protecting and advancing our personal, professional interests and long-term careers.

When the current, downward spiral hits bottom and the opportunistic part of the ‘industry’ hits the wall, the ‘profession’ will both gain and lose.  We will, of course, be blamed by the very entrepreneurs/opportunists responsible for the cause the collapse; after all, they are not likely to blame themselves for the poor quality of the translations they have sold and subsequently procured from dubious sources, are they?

Hopefully though, the end clients will learn that having a close and enduring relationship with a professional translator delivers better quality at the same if not lower cost.  The critical factor in this, is whether the end client understands the difference between an intermediary sourcing the cheapest possible translation through the internet, and a well-established, accredited, professional translator.  Even more importantly, whether a client will be able to locate and identify a professional translator.  If not, the client will choose an agency to ‘find the translator’ (read: handle the translation), and we will be right back where we started.

There are a number of solutions, but until everybody agrees on what the problem is, no solution will be seriously considered or accepted.  This is where my innate optimism takes a bit of a beating.  Discussions among translators suggest that every 12 of them have 13 or more different opinions on whether translators are free-lancers (i.e. casual employees hired by agencies), self-employed professionals, or business owners/vendors of translation services.  Few of the opinions demonstrate any knowledge or understanding of the differences.  Yet, it is the thorough understanding of these differences that determines the strategies that are likely to succeed and/or fail.




To define oneself or to be defined by others

1 Jul

IMG_3358 best cropped to 320 x 200 shortIt seems to me that the way we are perceived will calibrate a future client’s expectations of what we will be able to do for them, and by extension, what we should be paid for doing it if ‘hired’.

I used the term ‘hired’ in the last sentence, because it is a word most often used by translation ‘industry’ intermediaries (agencies, LSPs, brokers, entrepreneurs, hucksters, etc.) to define the process of engaging the services of an independent translator.  They also use terms like vendor, free-lance/r, member of ‘their’ team, etc., in a deliberate attempt to lower the perception of a translator’s importance in their scheme of things, i.e. the product chain they have created and control.

As part of their overall strategy, intermediaries will also insist that translators fill in ‘application forms’ even though their profiles are readily available on the internet sites where they advertised the project.  They often demand that the translator sign a contract disguised as a confidentiality agreement, and they insist that the translator accept the intermediary’s ‘terms and conditions’ and agrees to a piecework rate of pay in advance of being considered for any (potential) engagement.

These terms and conditions usually include very generous payment terms (funded by the translator for the benefit of the intermediary), yet the intermediaries generally offer little or nothing in return apart from a promise of ‘potential’ work provided the ‘price’ is right.  This is clearly where a free-lance translator will be offering his or her lance in return for whatever wage is offered (ProZ, Translation Directory, etc.)

The terms used leave little doubt that most intermediaries see independent and free-lance translators as casual employees or day labourers at best, and they expect them to work at their direction and for piecework rates that reflect this perception.  Yet, when viewing the often spectacular internet sites of the same intermediaries, they claim to have ‘as part of their team’ a selection of the best qualified professionals that the world has to offer. As Transperfect puts it: “a network of over 5,000 certified linguists and subject-area specialists”, which appears to be the only reference to the people who actually provide the services they sell.

So why this apparent contradiction in the way they present the resources they claim to have available and the way they treat the very same ‘certified linguists and specialists’.  Well, the principle is a well-established one and simple enough.  To succeed as an intermediary/trader/business, you must sell high and buy low (the bigger the difference, the more money you make), so intermediaries do battle on two fronts:

(1) they sell their services in a very competitive market of their own making, i.e. the market for translation services or the ‘industry’.  Supply (the number of intermediaries) in this market is plentiful because anybody can hang out a shingle; and as a result, demand (for translation work) is limited by being spread among the many competitors.  This makes it tough to sell translation services, and pricing is often the blunt instrument used by those with little else to offer.

(2) once an intermediary secures a ‘sale’, they need to find a ‘supplier’ for the service they have just offered to provide, i.e. a competent, professional translator, and at the best possible price/cost (you can see how having a long list of translators with fixed rates per word can be very useful in the context).  Thanks to the internet, free entry into the translation ‘profession’ and the market power of the intermediaries facilitated by various blind auction sites like ProZ, supply in this case is also plentiful whereas demand is limited by the number of projects available.  This makes it easy (and cheap) to ‘purchase’ what is needed, and allows the intermediaries to set and control conditions and prices, almost at will.  In other words, a failed market.

If you are a little confused after reading the last paragraph, just remember that for an intermediary, getting the business is tough, but finding a suck.. (oops), I mean a translator to do the work is easy.  It’s the same reason why many famous brands of expensive clothing and footwear spend a fortune on sales and marketing, and pay the poor sods that make the clothes and the runners from the loose change in their petty cash tin.  Hurray for for good old unfettered crapitalism, corruption and modern slavery.

So, from from the intermediaries’ perspective, they have adopted the correct business strategies.  From a professional translator’s point of view, however, the situation is clearly undesirable if not disastrous.  I am not telling you anything new here, however, the question begs to be asked why so many recognise that there is a major problem, and yet so few appear do anything about it.

Whilst changing the world is not the easiest of tasks, there are strategies that will, even if only incrementally, change things for the better if there are enough people tilting at this windmill.  The first and foremost of the things we can do is what we are supposed to be expert at: getting the nomenclature right.  We must make up our own mind about who and what we are, what we do, and how we do it, and we must express it in a language of our own, instead of allowing intermediaries to label us in the self-serving way they do.

Even more importantly, we must stop using the labels they have assigned to us to serve their own objectives, and start using our own.  I cringe every time I hear a colleague referring to himself or herself a being a free-lancer instead of a self-employed professional; being part of an ‘industry’ instead of a ‘profession’; being a ‘vendor’, a ‘supplier’, or having ‘a business like any other’.

Notwithstanding some ill-informed comments made by some contributors to various translator forums, including a few professional colleagues who are unable or unwilling to understand the distinction, being a professional translator is NOT a business.  We are not businessmen any more than your doctor, dentist or lawyer would regard themselves as businessmen (trust me, I have been a businessman for a large part of my career).  We do not buy and sell products or services.  We practise a professional skill based on knowledge, training and experience acquired through education, work experience and professional development, and we abide by ethical standards and codes of conduct that would be regarded as extremely onerous by most businesses.

Our incomes are not made up of gross sales – cost of sales = gross margin.  We do not generate a gross profit after deducting operating expenses from our gross margin.  Our incomes are made up of fees charged for highly specialised, professional services and advice, most of which make up our direct personal income (around 80%+ in my case, and I venture in the case of most of my professional colleagues).
So, if you accept the reasoning outlined above, we can move on to some of the things we can do to begin with.

As I have indicated in previous posts, we first-of-all need to differentiate ourselves as (certified) professional translators, as opposed to para-professionals or free-lancers.  In my view, a professional translator is university educated and is experienced enough to independently deliver a quality translation project or specialised advice in the language pair and field of specialisation.  He or she will have kept abreast of the latest technology used to improve the processes, consistency and accuracy of translations, and will take pride in their professional skill and conduct.

We (should) refer to ourselves as independent, (certified) professional translators rather than free-lancers, we (should) quote a fee or estimate for a project after careful examination of the source documents and the client’s requirements, rather than a rate per word (in advance of knowing what is required).  We (should) set our own terms and conditions, quality and ethical standards rather than accepting those stipulated by an intermediary who is not a qualified professional.

In other words, we must start acting as professionals if we have any hope of ever being regarded as professionals, and we must resist the pressures of the translation ‘industry’ who want to dominate their relationship with translators in order to control (reduce) their costs.  There is much more we can do, but this would be a good start.  Anything we do without getting these basics right, is probably going to be a waste of time and effort.

For more details about my professional profile, go to:

Translator credit for agencies/intermediaries

9 Jun

IMG_3358 best cropped to 320 x 200 shortWhen it comes to translators complaining about LSPs/agencies and other intermediaries, their ‘payment practices’ are right up there with the pressure on ‘rates’ (if you are a professional translator, please charge a fee for the project, instead of agreeing to ‘rates’).

I recently terminated a successful, long-time working relationship with a colleague, who has operated a one-man, well-established translation services practice for more than 30 years.  He sent me a lot of Dutch/Flemish>English translation work for almost a decade.  He liked the quick turnarounds, my knowledge, expertise and experience in the technical/commercial/legal field, all of which allowed him to build a reputation for being able to provide high-quality technical/commercial/legal Dutch>English translations.

His payment practices were somewhat erratic, averaging 60 days from date of invoice/completion of project (some one-man operations are a bit like that), but I weighed this against the regular volume, the close and collegial collaboration, and his willingness to pay my very reasonable fees.  I also knew what he charged the client, so a solid professional relationship worth looking after.

However, when the financial tsunami hit Europe, (once again) caused by the Wall Street Casino, things went pear-shaped and he admitted that things were getting difficult, so I agreed to be flexible and to help in any way I could.
However, when I started noticing that work dried up once accounts became seriously overdue, the warning lights started blinking.  This behaviour is fairly typical of such circumstances; use someone else until you can pay, and then switch back and let the other guy carry the can for a while (I have owned a collection agency in the distant past, so I have seen it all before).

When things went from bad to worse early this year, he told me that he was setting up additional (small) and unrelated businesses to diversify his income stream and that he ‘hoped to be able to pay me soon’.

When I pointed out that he was using my money to set up other businesses, the response became a little terse, focusing on his ‘loyalty to me’ over the years and how “he had advanced payment to me and his other translators over the years before he got paid himself”.  This argument has been used by other intermediaries, and the sheer chutzpah needed to use it, is breathtaking.  I made an attempt at pointing out that he was not an agent acting on my behalf and in my interest, and that my contract was with him only, not his client….. It was a waste of time, and I was accused of refusing to see his point of view.  Also not uncommon in these situations.

I am sure you understand that my willingness to be flexible, evaporated at this point, so I examined the realities, separate from our personal and business relationship, and here they are:

The commercial realities are relatively simple: the capital that a business enterprise requires, is usually made up of 3 main components:

(1) the capital (often in the form of a loan) that the owner puts into the business and on which he must earn a return to cover inflation, opportunity cost and risk (I would think at least 15% in the current settings for this type of ‘enterprise’).  In small businesses, this loan is often extracted again as soon as cash-flow becomes available, rendering the financial foundation of such small privately-owned businesses rather weak, to say the least;

(2) borrowings like overdrafts, secured loans, etc., on which the business has to pay the bank interest (say around 12 – 15% when including fees and penalties)

(3) working capital made up of the positive difference between assets and liabilities.  In this type of business, this is primarily the difference between the money that the business is owed by clients, and the money it owes the translators (debtors and creditors respectively).

The latter, (3), is essentially free money, of course. The sooner you can get your clients to pay, and the longer you delay payment of your translators, the more working capital you have, and the less you need of the two former modes of (costly) financing.

Unfortunately, the reverse is also true, and this poses a considerable risk for the translators working for such agencies. Many fly-by-night, and even well-established agencies, with little or no capital or borrowings of their own, will try to make ends meet by carefully managing (manipulating) this equation. However, they fall over rather rapidly when things get tough and their own clients delay payment.  When this happens, it is the unfortunate translator who foots the bill.

If my observations are anything to go by in this business of rapid global interchange of services and payments, the translators generally know little or nothing about the agency or its owner(s) that would either warn them about the risks of extending credit to them, or to help them collect their money when the proverbial hits the fan.

It seems that in this respect too, the freelance translator is the proverbial ‘hindmost’ in this predominantly Anglo-American model of a largely free-for-all, market-driven economy where it is ‘every man for himself and the devil take the hindmost’.
There is a need for freelance translators to first request some basic information do some ‘due diligence’ before agreeing to extend credit to an agency, e.g. owner(‘s) name and private address, business registration, years in business, etc.

Oops, I just got interrupted by a pig flying past my window 🙂

For more details about my professional profile, go to:

08 Internal audit – our strengths

22 May

IMG_3358 best cropped to 320 x 200 shortWe are now into the home straight, the place where we start dealing with solutions and strategies.  But before we get to that, we need to complete the internal audit and identify our strengths.  When it comes to languages and translation, there are none so confident as translators!  However, when it comes to talking about being successful commercially, many among us start looking uneasy, nervous and confused.

Let’s hope we can change that.  One of the problems I encountered when running workshops on technical commercial issues associated with being a free-lance or independent professional, is that there is great variation in the levels of knowledge and understanding between individual translators.  Some are way up there and even do their own accounting, whereas others have only the vaguest of ideas about the basics.

Whilst a major drawback for the latter on an individual level; and probably one reason why some qualified professional translators continue to work for agencies offering a pittance; the enormous variety of backgrounds, knowledge and experience available within the profession as a whole, can be an enormous resource.  Having said that, I have also noticed that we are not very good at marshalling this resource.  Long periods of working alone, seems to reduce confidence of many who could make an enormous contribution to the profession.

Perhaps the fear of criticism, as opposed to the confidence born of the ignorance on the part of those who are less than properly qualified, may discourage those who have a positive contribution to make.  Be that as it may, I know from experience that there is a great deal of knowledge and talent among professional translators.  Here are some of the positives that I am aware of an may be able to be used to our common advantage:

  1. Most professional translators have (and must have in my view) at least a Bachelor degree or equivalent from a reputable university, either in translating or any other discipline, together with more than 5 years of experience.  Many, like myself, have a Master’s degree , and I know there are quite a number among us who have a PhD.
    So we are not going to be short of intelligence or knowledge if we are prepared to work together to achieve our objectives;
  2. Having a tertiary education is not the ‘be all and end all’, of course, but it will draw a clear line in the sand that every lay person (read: potential client) understands, and it will clearly differentiate us from a great many dubious entrants into the sector, attracted by agencies and auction sites like ProZ et al;
  3. Also like myself, many of us have come to the translation profession later in life, after a career in either a different or a related field, and can contribute practical knowledge of experience where required;
  4. Almost all of us are very comfortable with computers, software and the internet, and we are very connected with all parts of the world and each other.  I would be surprised if we cannot do most of what needs to be done to restore our profession to a place that fulfils our professional aspirations without much outside help;
  5. We are competent communicators and know how to put together a promotional page or brochure when we need one.  We understand and know how to research and explain concepts;
  6. Since we are self-employed, we have the freedom to conduct our professional life as we see fit, at least within the boundaries of what is ethically acceptable and professionally responsible.  We do not have to sell it to any superiors, we can just go ahead and do it;

Now, I did not say that it is going to be easy, so when we start working on objectives and strategies, we must bear all the foregoing in mind

Moreover, few of us, myself included, are going to make an enormous effort for the ‘greater good’ if every Dick, Tom and Harry is going to be able to just walk in and take advantage of it; or worse, attack it because of ignorance or because of a vested interest in seeing us fail.
We cannot and must not allow any infiltration by those outside the profession.  The reasons will be discussed in confidence later.

It is clear therefore, that before we start developing short and long-term objectives and the strategies for achieving them, we must close the doors, post a bouncer, and only admit those who qualify.  This is where the rubber hits the road.

My suggestion is that we start simply, with an internet site exclusively for the listing of qualified (later certified), experienced professional translators, who are able to handle projects competently and professionally by themselves.  It must not be used for any other purpose than to provide a platform for potential clients to find and choose a suitable professional in the knowledge that he or she will be in good hands.  The site should have no commercial purpose, and given enough participants, individual costs should be minimal.

Each page should be uniform and simple, providing basic information such as a head shot (photograph rather than a bullet) to make it more personal, and the bare essentials to determine whether the professional concerned specialises in the languages and specialisations that fit a potential client’s needs.  As I have said elsewhere, there should be no e-mail address or other contact details, because they will be stripped out and used by agencies and advertisers to bulk mail.
That would put us back to square one, blind auctions of agency jobs!

The site should only provide a link to the personal URL of the individual chosen.  The potential client can take it from there, in the knowledge that he or she will be dealing with a ‘professional’. In doing it this way, we will be building a database of professional colleagues in a closed environment, and we can build our objectives and strategies amongst ourselves as we go forward, without having others looking over our shoulders.  Moreover, we will start getting the benefits from the site whilst we build it and develop the strategies to promote it.

When, individuals wish to link up with colleagues down the road, to form partnerships, groups or other arrangements to strengthen their commercial success, there will be a ready supply of vetted colleagues to choose from.  There will also be the opportunity of selecting colleagues for ad hoc collaboration, such as proof reading or getting a second opinion, etc.

Paradoxically, the one thing that is likely to complicate things is languages.  If we do not work in cohorts of, say English speakers, Spanish speakers, and perhaps others down the track, it is going to be very difficult to create order and unity to move forward.

However, before we can do anything, we must decide the requirements for being admitted to the profession (and the group).  We cannot afford to have anyone listed who is unable to deliver a project within his or her area of expertise, in a professional manner, meeting the standards that we consider desirable.  We will be condemned immediately and ‘en masse’, if one of us lets the side down, particularly as we start to promote the site.

It seems to me therefore that we are going to need a simple code of conduct that we can start out with, simply outlining the how to respond to an enquiry, how to cost and price the service requested, how and what to deliver and how to invoice, for example.

I have been working on such a code for a while, more on that after we closed the door to outsiders.  I look forward to hearing from you whether you are happy to proceed on this basis, or whether you propose an alternative.

More in 09

For more details about my professional profile, go to:

07 Internal audit – Our main weaknesses

21 May

IMG_3358 best cropped to 320 x 200 shortOK, the mission:

The translation profession’s mission is to differentiate itself from the translation ‘industry’ (agencies, brokers, intermediaries and paraprofessional translators), and establish world-wide recognition as Certified Practising/Professional Translators (CPTs), working independently or in professional practices/partnerships, providing reliable, high-quality language translation services and associated professional advice.

As I said in the previous post: to be successful, we must exploit our strengths and work to reduce, if not eliminate, our weaknesses.  Common sense.  So let us start with looking at the weaknesses we have that may impede our path to success.

As our colleague Jose Ribeiro pointed out, and I am sure he meant it in the best possible way, “freelance Translators would be ‘one-man-organizations’ if they had the skills of translators, IT experts, Finance Managers, Marketing wizards, DTP experts and some others, besides the ability to multi-task different projects and manage them successfully”.  

There are lots of weaknesses to choose from…

He makes a very valid point that I will get back to.  However, professional translators are not organisations or business, they are individual, self-employed professionals.  My doctor or dentist, and even my accountant, do not have any or all of those skills either, that is why they operate as self-employed professionals or buy into a small professional practice (partnership), and are not CEOs of large companies or organisations.  If we are to get anywhere, we too, must understand that we are not ‘businesses’, but self-employed professionals, a very different animal, even if there are some similarities.

Business is a general term used for describing commercial activity.
However, there are many types and classes of commercial activity, e.g. ‘manufacturing’ and ‘trading’ come to mind in this context.  Being an independent, self-employed professional is a very specific commercial activity, with very specific characteristics, ethics and responsibilities. It is usually well-remunerated (though not always as we know to our cost), because of the burden of responsibility they usually carry, the early and ongoing training and education required, and the high standards of ethical conduct to which they are held, the key ingredient for generating the necessary trust required to do things well.

So, back to our weaknesses as they relate to professional success (or, indeed, the lack thereof):

  1. Most professions have a clear and obvious career path, including training and education, mentoring requirements, rules against incorporating to limit personal liability, etc., which tends to produce a fairly homogeneous group of people. Internationally, their language may differ, but their levels and type of training will be very similar.  Within one country, where everybody speaks the same language, this makes it reasonably easy to put together professional associations and institutes to protect and advance the interests of the profession as a whole and its members individually.  After all, they probably even think the same way!  However, I do not have to tell you what an eclectic lot translators are; and because our profession makes it almost mandatory to operate internationally, it is a true tower of Babel as far as individuals are concerned.  In short, the very difference of backgrounds, education and training, cultural diversity and economic environments, puts ‘organizing translators’ on a par with ‘herding cats’;  I know, because I have tried it within our institute in Australia.
  2. Because most translators do not follow a career path that includes a period of mentoring by experienced, certified practitioners, such a ‘clerking’ in the case of graduate lawyers and 2 years of ‘slavery’ for a registered CPA whilst attending professional development classes in the evenings before being admitted to the accounting profession, few among us find out how to deal with the commercial aspects of being an independent professional.  Think about marketing, costing, pricing, billing, accounting, forming partnerships, computers, software, taxes, insurance, PD, etc. ad infinitum, all of which lawyers and accountants see at close quarters whilst learning the ropes as ‘trainees’. This probably goes a long way to explaining what Jose pointed out so elegantly above.  Whilst explaining it does not fix the problem, it at least identifies it as a weakness, so that we can develop the strategies to overcome it.  I have run workshops for colleagues here in Australia, so I have some idea about what the challenges are.  More about the solutions and strategies in the step after the internal audit (knowledge and understanding before judgement).
  3. No doubt the frequent absence of commercial skills among professional translators is also partly responsible for how the profession has been subordinated by intermediaries. In the absence of a well-defined, visible  profession made up of certified individuals, the intermediaries have created a value chain that effectively locks translators into a very weak position commercially, i.e. at the end of the value chain, which is always the weakest position.  I regard this situation as the most serious of our weaknesses, i.e. the status quo in the market for translation services, and where it appears to be headed, i.e. ‘into the toilet’.  In other words, we are way behind the eight-ball and not only need to get out of this value chain as it is slowly collapsing the profession, we also need to build an identifiable professional profile (like a CPA) to inspire confidence in potential clients and to make the good ones think twice about using cheap/unqualified translators or intermediaries.  Of course, we could continue to fight with the intermediaries/agencies for a fair slice of the cake from the position we are in now, but that reminds me of  ‘The Ingenious Gentleman Don Quixote of La Mancha’ and his faithful assistant Sancho Panza  😦
  4. Because of the state of the profession (as part of the aforementioned value chain), professional translators have had to lower their aspirations, so there is little money available to make the changes necessary to recover from the disaster it is today.  However, in terms of creating perceptions and professional status-building, money generally provides little more that a shortening of the time-frames, e.g. with advertising, promotion, PR, etc., you can get to your objective quicker.  Since we do not have the money, time will have to be our weapon of choice, so we will need to adopt long, rather than short-term term objectives and strategies for achieving them, and be patient but persistent.
    Not everybody’s cup of tea I am afraid, but reality is a hard task master.
  5. Because of the aforementioned diversity among members of our profession, and the general lack of knowledge and training in commercial and strategic matters, it will also be slower and more difficult to agree on strategies and objectives.  In my own experience within our professional institute, I have found that few of the strategies I have proposed from time-to-time, have been acted upon.  In analyzing why this has been the case, I have come to the conclusion that when people do not fully understand something, they are reluctant to act on it.  Decision-making also takes courage, and like most things we are afraid of at first, the more you do it, the easier it gets. In general terms, translators are probably not the most experienced decision-makers one might meet everyday.  So we will experience the same problem, at least to some extent.
    I regard it as the current we have to row against, so we’ll just have to pull that little bit harder.

  6. One more weakness that I have already touched upon, is the ‘variable’ quality and lack of effectiveness of our professional institutes and associations.
    It will be self-evident to everyone, that an institute of management consultants or company directors would do better than an institute of ballet dancers or translators, particularly if managed by volunteers from their respective professions (don’t put any money on it, I know it is not always true).  In my case in Australia, this is exacerbated by the fact that we have a mixture of professional and para-professional members in our institute.  The former want to lift the profile of their profession to achieve better recognition along the lines that we are working on, whereas the latter are looking to unionize in order to extract better ‘wages’ from the handful of agencies they work for.  A cart with a horse before it pulling one way, and a horse at the back pulling in the opposite direction.  This only works if you want ‘draw and quarter someone’ like in the ‘good old days’.  We face the same problem, but there are solutions I will  discuss later. Bear in mind that we will be judged by the lowest common denominator; and, last but not least,
  7. The willingness of some colleagues to be treated as casual, semi-skilled labour.  It reinforces the exact opposite of what we need to achieve.  I know this is a tough one, but here too, there are strategies we can use to initially improve things, and to move to a more desirable position in the long run.  Working for a discounted fee is one thing, but doffing your cap and pulling your forelock in humble gratitude sends the wrong signal.

As with the previous posts, I have focused on the main, generally-known and critical issues.  It is not a detailed, academic study, but a practical analysis for the purpose of developing appropriate, broad strategies, so any sensible input is welcome.

Next, I will deal with our strengths, and you will be surprised at what we generally ‘hide under a bushel’ for some reason.  Perhaps one of our traits is modesty and reserve 🙂  Nothing wrong with that in a professional person, but we also need to be practical and look to our own future.

More in 08

For more details about my professional profile, go to:


06 External audit – Opportunities

19 May

IMG_3358 best cropped to 320 x 200 short(Always) remember the mission, i.e. the mission for the translation ‘profession’, not for a commercial group, or a professional practice, or individual translator.  That will come later, based on the general principles, framework and strategic plan developed for the ‘profession’ as a whole.

The translation profession’s mission is to differentiate itself from the translation ‘industry’ (agencies, brokers, intermediaries and paraprofessional translators), and establish world-wide recognition as Certified Practising/Professional Translators (CPTs), working independently or in professional practices, providing reliable, high-quality language translation services and associated professional advice.

OK, it is easier to identify problems than opportunities, because the former tend to get our attention when they cause difficulties, annoyance and frustration, whereas opportunities are not always obvious to everyone.

There is, and always will be, a role for competent, professional agencies to manage large translation projects of a basic nature, i.e. a project management role.  However, there will be a number of obvious advantages in cutting out intermediaries who do not add value, particularly for a translation between two particular languages or within a related group of languages handled by a professional translation practice specializing in these languages.

The rising number of intermediaries entering the market obviously includes opportunists that have little or no professional, language or translation skills, and are competing for business only on price, and the promise of almost instantaneous delivery.  Their claims are often misleading, and rely on the ignorance of potential clients and aspiring or unqualified free-lancers, to capture part of the rapidly expanding demand for translation services.

Any translator who has been approached  by such ‘LSPs’ will be aware of the increasingly ridiculous delivery time-lines that are specified, and paradoxically, the sharply declining rates that are offered to meet these deadlines.  They will also be aware of the effect this is having on the ability of well-established and experienced professional agencies and qualified translators, to compete with them.

I have frequently listened, at first sceptically I admit, to what is clearly the genuine lament of very professional agency clients who were formerly happy to pay my very reasonable rates, when they told me that they can no longer afford to do so because of the ‘competitive situation’ in the ‘market’.

These developments inevitably lead to the hiring of often inexperienced or unqualified translators, and as a consequence, to failures in terms of delivery and quality.  I hope and expect that this will result in a growing realization on the part of potential clients, that using intermediaries other than professional agencies to handle professional services, is increasingly fraught with considerable risk.  The situation is not helped by well-qualified colleagues lowering their rates to unsustainable levels, thus prolonging and exacerbating the problem.
I know you have to eat, but not just today.  What about next year?

Some of the main external opportunities for differentiating ourselves from the industry, therefore, are:

  1. to make potential clients aware that these risks can be reduced if not eliminated altogether, by using the advice and the skills of a properly qualified, accredited and experienced ‘professional’ translator for a specific task;
  2. to point out the advantages that can be derived from direct contact between the client and the professional handling the translation, which is likely to ensure a much better understanding of the client’s needs, leading to better outcomes;
  3. to demonstrate the potential for a substantial reduction in immediate costs by eliminating the intermediary, who has overheads, sales and marketing expenses, as well as the need to make a profit;
  4. to point to an improvement in delivery time-lines by eliminating double-handling, as well as the opportunity to deliver files as they are completed, rather than waiting until the entire project has been completed (and reassembled when using multiple translators to meet an irrational promise of an almost impossible delivery deadline).
    I rarely find that a direct client is in a great hurry, other then lawyers, of course :-);
  5. to provide a client with a direct, professional warranty in respect of quality and reliability;
  6. to get to know the client’s business and therefore to provide a style of writing that is closely aligned to the client’s corporate image; and,
  7. to develop a relationship with a professional translator who is able to assist with advice, recommendations for languages and material he or she is not qualified to handle.
    After all, entry into a foreign market is rarely a one-off event.  It takes time and effort to succeed in a foreign market, and having a professional language expert on your side is an enormous help with advice on both language and cultural issues.

Given a good bottle of red (for inspirational purposes only you understand), I am sure that I and a few close colleagues could come up with more opportunities to market the advantages of using translation professionals rather than intermediaries, and I hope some of you will contribute to the above list by responding to this post.

We need to collect and assemble these advantages in a well-prepared document, on a/our websites, and promote them at every opportunity.

However, none of this is going to be of any use whatsoever to our cause, if a potential client cannot distinguish between a properly qualified, accredited and experienced translator, and anyone else out there making a series of dubious if not downright fraudulent claims in this regard.  Particularly also, if some of our professional colleagues keep accepting work at a pauper’s wage instead of offering their services at a fee that properly reflects their education, training and experience.  It is also clear that professional translators must collaborate with colleagues or establish professional practices to handle larger projects and different languages.

Ergo, for qualified, accredited and experienced translators to succeed in this rapidly failing market, we must differentiate ourselves from the rest (i.e. when it hits the fan, we must make sure that we are in a different room :-).  Before we work on how best to do this (short-term and long-term objectives and the strategies for achieving them) we must complete our SWOT/TOWS analysis, i.e. the identification of our own (internal) weaknesses and strengths.

To be successful, we must exploit our strengths and work to reduce, if not eliminate, our weaknesses.

In my next blog, I will try and list what I regard as our greatest weaknesses (get the bad news out of the way first!).  (07)

For more details about my professional profile, go to: